{"id":3168,"date":"2013-03-07T09:30:00","date_gmt":"2013-03-07T14:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.domainandtrademark.com\/?p=3168"},"modified":"2019-08-09T08:49:36","modified_gmt":"2019-08-09T12:49:36","slug":"washington-redskins-face-new-trademark-hearing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cscdbs.com\/blog\/washington-redskins-face-new-trademark-hearing\/","title":{"rendered":"Washington Redskins face new trademark hearing"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>American football franchise the Washington Redskins is facing another legal battle over its <a title=\"Trademark Monitoring Services\" href=\"https:\/\/www.cscglobal.com\/global\/web\/csc\/trademark-monitoring.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">trademark<\/a> due to campaigners deeming it offensive to Native Americans.<\/p>\n<p>A group of Native Americans are to go before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board to argue their case that the football team should lose its federal trademark protection for the term &#8216;Redskins&#8217;.<\/p>\n<p>The basis for their argument is that the law prohibits disparaging, scandalous, contemptuous or disreputable names being trademarked. Many Native Americans believe the term falls into a few of these categories, even though the football team has said it doesn&#8217;t think the term is offensive at all.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>It is not the first time the Washington Redskins has come under fire from campaigners. A previous case has been brought to court but was thrown out due to the term not being deemed offensive.<\/p>\n<p>In 1992 Suzan Shown Harjo argued that the team&#8217;s name should not have trademark protection because of its disparaging nature. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office actually ruled in Ms. Harjo&#8217;s favor in 1999, however the decision was overturned after an appeal in 2005.<\/p>\n<p>The basis to the overturning of the ruling was that the plaintiffs were too old and that they should have filed the complaint sooner. However the new case is being put forward by a different group of Native Americans, none of whom are aged over 24.<\/p>\n<p>The football team used to be called the Braves, but adopted the Redskins name and logo in 1933 when the team was based in Boston, Massachusetts. The team has said the name was changed to honor William Henry &#8220;Lone Star&#8221; Dietz, a Native American who coached the team at the time.<\/p>\n<p>A formal trademark for the name was granted in 1967 by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. It has been renewed many times since then.<\/p>\n<p>The Washington Redskins clearly <a title=\"Band Protection Services\" href=\"https:\/\/www.cscglobal.com\/global\/web\/csc\/domains-and-trademarks.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">value their brand and trademark<\/a> highly, having spent millions of dollars protecting and promoting it. It has become one of the most recognized franchises in the National Football League and will therefore be eager to retain the trademark.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>American football franchise the Washington Redskins is facing another legal battle over its trademark due to campaigners deeming it offensive to Native Americans.<\/p>\n<p>A group of Native Americans are to go before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board to argue their case that the football team should lose its federal trademark protection for the term &#8216;Redskins&#8217;.<\/p>\n<p>The basis for their argument is that the law prohibits disparaging, scandalous, contemptuous or disreputable names being trademarked. Many Native Americans believe the term falls into a few of these categories, even though the football team has said it doesn&#8217;t think the term is offensive at all.<\/p>\n<p>It is not the first time the Washington Redskins has come under fire from campaigners. A previous case has been brought to court but was thrown out due to the term not being deemed offensive.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[19,161,60,29,13,528],"class_list":["post-3168","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-brands","tag-brand-management","tag-brand-protection","tag-trademark","tag-trademark-protection","tag-trademark-services","tag-trademarks"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.5 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Washington Redskins face new trademark hearing | CSC<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"American football franchise the Washington Redskins is facing another legal battle over its trademark due to campaigners deeming it offensive to Native Americans.  A group of Native Americans are to go before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board to argue their case that the football team should lose its federal trademark protection for the term &#039;Redskins&#039;.  The basis for their argument is that the law prohibits disparaging, scandalous, contemptuous or disreputable names being trademarked. Many Native Americans believe the term falls into a few of these categories, even though the football team has said it doesn&#039;t think the term is offensive at all.  It is not the first time the Washington Redskins has come under fire from campaigners. A previous case has been brought to court but was thrown out due to the term not being deemed offensive.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.cscdbs.com\/blog\/washington-redskins-face-new-trademark-hearing\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Washington Redskins face new trademark hearing | CSC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"American football franchise the Washington Redskins is facing another legal battle over its trademark due to campaigners deeming it offensive to Native Americans.  A group of Native Americans are to go before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board to argue their case that the football team should lose its federal trademark protection for the term &#039;Redskins&#039;.  The basis for their argument is that the law prohibits disparaging, scandalous, contemptuous or disreputable names being trademarked. Many Native Americans believe the term falls into a few of these categories, even though the football team has said it doesn&#039;t think the term is offensive at all.  It is not the first time the Washington Redskins has come under fire from campaigners. A previous case has been brought to court but was thrown out due to the term not being deemed offensive.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.cscdbs.com\/blog\/washington-redskins-face-new-trademark-hearing\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Digital Brand Services Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/corporationserviceco\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2013-03-07T14:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-08-09T12:49:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"CSC Digital Brand Services\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@cscdbs\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@cscdbs\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"CSC Digital Brand Services\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cscdbs.com\\\/blog\\\/washington-redskins-face-new-trademark-hearing\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cscdbs.com\\\/blog\\\/washington-redskins-face-new-trademark-hearing\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"CSC Digital Brand Services\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cscdbs.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/287f596645b34f3ea2b2d7e11d990868\"},\"headline\":\"Washington Redskins face new trademark hearing\",\"datePublished\":\"2013-03-07T14:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-08-09T12:49:36+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cscdbs.com\\\/blog\\\/washington-redskins-face-new-trademark-hearing\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":351,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cscdbs.com\\\/blog\\\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"brand management\",\"brand protection\",\"trademark\",\"trademark protection\",\"trademark services\",\"Trademarks\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Brand Protection\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cscdbs.com\\\/blog\\\/washington-redskins-face-new-trademark-hearing\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cscdbs.com\\\/blog\\\/washington-redskins-face-new-trademark-hearing\\\/\",\"name\":\"Washington Redskins face new trademark hearing | CSC\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cscdbs.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2013-03-07T14:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-08-09T12:49:36+00:00\",\"description\":\"American football franchise the Washington Redskins is facing another legal battle over its trademark due to campaigners deeming it offensive to Native Americans. A group of Native Americans are to go before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board to argue their case that the football team should lose its federal trademark protection for the term 'Redskins'. The basis for their argument is that the law prohibits disparaging, scandalous, contemptuous or disreputable names being trademarked. Many Native Americans believe the term falls into a few of these categories, even though the football team has said it doesn't think the term is offensive at all. It is not the first time the Washington Redskins has come under fire from campaigners. A previous case has been brought to court but was thrown out due to the term not being deemed offensive.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cscdbs.com\\\/blog\\\/washington-redskins-face-new-trademark-hearing\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cscdbs.com\\\/blog\\\/washington-redskins-face-new-trademark-hearing\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cscdbs.com\\\/blog\\\/washington-redskins-face-new-trademark-hearing\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cscdbs.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Washington Redskins face new trademark hearing\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cscdbs.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cscdbs.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"Digital Brand Services Blog\",\"description\":\"Domains, new gTLDs, brand protection, security &amp; trademark news\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cscdbs.com\\\/blog\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cscdbs.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cscdbs.com\\\/blog\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"CSC Digital Brand Services\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cscdbs.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cscdbs.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cscwebcontentstorage.blob.core.windows.net\\\/cscmarketing-cscdbs-media\\\/uploads\\\/2018\\\/06\\\/cropped-dbs_small.gif\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cscwebcontentstorage.blob.core.windows.net\\\/cscmarketing-cscdbs-media\\\/uploads\\\/2018\\\/06\\\/cropped-dbs_small.gif\",\"width\":200,\"height\":200,\"caption\":\"CSC Digital Brand Services\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cscdbs.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/corporationserviceco\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/cscdbs\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/showcase\\\/csc-digital-brand-services\\\/\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cscdbs.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/287f596645b34f3ea2b2d7e11d990868\",\"name\":\"CSC Digital Brand Services\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/cscdigitalbrand.services\\\/blog\\\/\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Washington Redskins face new trademark hearing | CSC","description":"American football franchise the Washington Redskins is facing another legal battle over its trademark due to campaigners deeming it offensive to Native Americans.  A group of Native Americans are to go before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board to argue their case that the football team should lose its federal trademark protection for the term 'Redskins'.  The basis for their argument is that the law prohibits disparaging, scandalous, contemptuous or disreputable names being trademarked. Many Native Americans believe the term falls into a few of these categories, even though the football team has said it doesn't think the term is offensive at all.  It is not the first time the Washington Redskins has come under fire from campaigners. A previous case has been brought to court but was thrown out due to the term not being deemed offensive.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.cscdbs.com\/blog\/washington-redskins-face-new-trademark-hearing\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Washington Redskins face new trademark hearing | CSC","og_description":"American football franchise the Washington Redskins is facing another legal battle over its trademark due to campaigners deeming it offensive to Native Americans.  A group of Native Americans are to go before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board to argue their case that the football team should lose its federal trademark protection for the term 'Redskins'.  The basis for their argument is that the law prohibits disparaging, scandalous, contemptuous or disreputable names being trademarked. Many Native Americans believe the term falls into a few of these categories, even though the football team has said it doesn't think the term is offensive at all.  It is not the first time the Washington Redskins has come under fire from campaigners. A previous case has been brought to court but was thrown out due to the term not being deemed offensive.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.cscdbs.com\/blog\/washington-redskins-face-new-trademark-hearing\/","og_site_name":"Digital Brand Services Blog","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/corporationserviceco","article_published_time":"2013-03-07T14:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-08-09T12:49:36+00:00","author":"CSC Digital Brand Services","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@cscdbs","twitter_site":"@cscdbs","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"CSC Digital Brand Services","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.cscdbs.com\/blog\/washington-redskins-face-new-trademark-hearing\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.cscdbs.com\/blog\/washington-redskins-face-new-trademark-hearing\/"},"author":{"name":"CSC Digital Brand Services","@id":"https:\/\/www.cscdbs.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/287f596645b34f3ea2b2d7e11d990868"},"headline":"Washington Redskins face new trademark hearing","datePublished":"2013-03-07T14:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-08-09T12:49:36+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.cscdbs.com\/blog\/washington-redskins-face-new-trademark-hearing\/"},"wordCount":351,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.cscdbs.com\/blog\/#organization"},"keywords":["brand management","brand protection","trademark","trademark protection","trademark services","Trademarks"],"articleSection":["Brand Protection"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.cscdbs.com\/blog\/washington-redskins-face-new-trademark-hearing\/","url":"https:\/\/www.cscdbs.com\/blog\/washington-redskins-face-new-trademark-hearing\/","name":"Washington Redskins face new trademark hearing | CSC","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.cscdbs.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2013-03-07T14:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-08-09T12:49:36+00:00","description":"American football franchise the Washington Redskins is facing another legal battle over its trademark due to campaigners deeming it offensive to Native Americans. A group of Native Americans are to go before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board to argue their case that the football team should lose its federal trademark protection for the term 'Redskins'. The basis for their argument is that the law prohibits disparaging, scandalous, contemptuous or disreputable names being trademarked. Many Native Americans believe the term falls into a few of these categories, even though the football team has said it doesn't think the term is offensive at all. It is not the first time the Washington Redskins has come under fire from campaigners. A previous case has been brought to court but was thrown out due to the term not being deemed offensive.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.cscdbs.com\/blog\/washington-redskins-face-new-trademark-hearing\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.cscdbs.com\/blog\/washington-redskins-face-new-trademark-hearing\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.cscdbs.com\/blog\/washington-redskins-face-new-trademark-hearing\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.cscdbs.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Washington Redskins face new trademark hearing"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.cscdbs.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.cscdbs.com\/blog\/","name":"Digital Brand Services Blog","description":"Domains, new gTLDs, brand protection, security &amp; trademark news","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.cscdbs.com\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.cscdbs.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.cscdbs.com\/blog\/#organization","name":"CSC Digital Brand Services","url":"https:\/\/www.cscdbs.com\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.cscdbs.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/cscwebcontentstorage.blob.core.windows.net\/cscmarketing-cscdbs-media\/uploads\/2018\/06\/cropped-dbs_small.gif","contentUrl":"https:\/\/cscwebcontentstorage.blob.core.windows.net\/cscmarketing-cscdbs-media\/uploads\/2018\/06\/cropped-dbs_small.gif","width":200,"height":200,"caption":"CSC Digital Brand Services"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.cscdbs.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/corporationserviceco","https:\/\/x.com\/cscdbs","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/showcase\/csc-digital-brand-services\/"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.cscdbs.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/287f596645b34f3ea2b2d7e11d990868","name":"CSC Digital Brand Services","sameAs":["https:\/\/cscdigitalbrand.services\/blog\/"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cscdbs.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3168","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cscdbs.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cscdbs.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cscdbs.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cscdbs.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3168"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.cscdbs.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3168\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8028,"href":"https:\/\/www.cscdbs.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3168\/revisions\/8028"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cscdbs.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3168"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cscdbs.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3168"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cscdbs.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3168"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}